Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2747 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $100.0 vs $359.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 9 5950X - $1.1 vs $3.3 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 20% better in Sons Of The Forest than FX-6350 - 109 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Buy for $359.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |