Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 4417 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $189.95 vs $225.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 18% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Phenom X4 9550 - 136 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 20 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |