Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1897 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 22% better in Far Cry 6 than Phenom II X4 925 - 106 vs 87 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Deneb | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
