Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 3062 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom II X4 810 - 98 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 64 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 810
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | EPYC |
| Deneb | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
