Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 1533 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 79% cheaper than FX-8350 - $39.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-8350 - $0.21 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11599 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11598 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |