Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 377 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than FX-8120 - 603 vs 596 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 78% cheaper than FX-8350 - $39.99 vs $185.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Minecraft than FX-8350 - $0.07 vs $0.31 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11333 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |