Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2548 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $78.02 vs $750.0
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8120 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 24 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77198 minutes ago
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Zambezi | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |