Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3676 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $39.99 vs $177.2
- Up to 69% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-12600K - $0.33 vs $1.08 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 34% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-8120 - 164 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
Buy for $177.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |