Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1508 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $178.02 vs $405.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i9-9900K - $2.02 vs $3.14 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 47% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320E - 129 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18229 minutes ago
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |