Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 1694 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $178.02 vs $293.92
- Up to 10% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-9900 - $1.37 vs $1.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 48% better in War Thunder than FX-8320E - 192 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Buy for $293.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |