Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2600K is 1332 days older than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Rust than FX-8320E - 163 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-8320E - $85.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 55% better value when playing Rust than FX-8320E - $0.52 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13902 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |