Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 2702 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $178.02 vs $265.48
- Up to 8% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-12700 - $1.98 vs $2.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 37% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8320E - 123 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.16/FPS
91%
Price, $
$265.48
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |