Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500 is 854 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Performs up to 43% better in F1 23 than FX-8320E - 210 vs 147 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than FX-8320E - $89.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 65% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-8320E - $0.42 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13919 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13919 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-7500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |