Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3570 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3570 is 823 days older than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8320E - 468 vs 443 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than FX-8320E - $69.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 62% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8320E - $0.15 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13485 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
468
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13485 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |