Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700 is 981 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 48% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - 349 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than FX-8320 - $128.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - $0.37 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
349
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $128 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |