Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4388 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $82.02 vs $438.49
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 102% better in Starfield than FX-8150 - 87 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Buy for $438.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |