Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2645 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $64.03 vs $180.12
- Up to 56% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-9600KF - $0.53 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-8150 - 149 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3346 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
43%
Price, $
$180.12
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $180.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |