Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8150 is 143 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 28% cheaper than FX-8150 - $46.0 vs $64.03
- Up to 27% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-8150 - $0.22 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |