Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1013 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than FX-8150 - 198 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than FX-8150 - $48.5 vs $64.03
- Up to 29% better value when playing Valheim than FX-8150 - $0.24 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13746 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |