Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $74.04 vs $260.91
- Up to 66% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-11700F - $0.44 vs $1.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6300 - 202 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2441 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
34%
Price, $
$260.91
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2442 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |