Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $74.04 vs $225.99
- Up to 54% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-10700F - $1.68 vs $3.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 41% better in Starfield than FX-6300 - 62 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2575 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.65/FPS
46%
Price, $
$225.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2575 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |