Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1590 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $22.92 vs $48.1
- Up to 47% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-7100T - $0.2 vs $0.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4130 - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |