Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 1488 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than EPYC 7551P - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i5-4670T |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |