Buy on Amazon
$78.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2087 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8120 - 160 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 95W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| EPYC | Collection | FX |
| Naples | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
