Buy on Amazon
$225
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1036 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than EPYC 7551 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
