Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1036 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than EPYC 7551 - 596 vs 501 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
596
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |