Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 1436 days newer than Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 1% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i3-6100 - 231 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Processor (BX80662I36100)
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
