Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 211 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than EPYC 7282 - 58 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$101
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $101 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |