Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 267 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 2042 than EPYC 7282 - 167 vs 159 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |