Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G7400 outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G7400 is 881 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G7400
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than EPYC 7282 - 141 vs 129 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $102.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G7400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |