Key Differences
In short — m18 (2024) outperforms the cheaper ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of m18 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 112% better in No Man's Sky than ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim - 142 vs 67 FPS
Advantages of ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim Laptop
- Up to 60% cheaper than m18 (2024) - $1015.79 vs $2542.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing No Man's Sky than m18 (2024) - $15.16 vs $17.9 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.9/FPS
84.69273743016761%
Price, $
$2542
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,542 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92933 minutes ago
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
FPS
67
47.183098591549296%
Value, $/FPS
$15.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1015.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,015.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
51.96656833824975%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27.714051618189266%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5800H
null-core
Single-Core
1749
66.04984894259819%
Multi-Core
7120
51.70285382325176%
m18 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Dec 13th, 2021 |
| Ryzen 9 7845HX | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 18" | Screen Size | 16" |
