Key Differences
In short — Acer Nitro 16 outperforms ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Nitro 16 is 333 days newer than ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim.
Advantages of Acer Nitro 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 93% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim - 131 vs 68 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 394 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 8th, 2023 • 1st Variation
Apr 5th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 8th, 2023 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
Apr 5th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 8th, 2023 • 1st Variation
Ryzen 7 6800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1874
79%
Multi-Core
9030
82%
Apr 5th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Ryzen 7 7840HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2365
100%
Multi-Core
11008
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim Laptop | vs | Acer Nitro 16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| May 8th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 6800H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
3840x2160 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
