Key Differences
In short — m18 (2024) outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of m18 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Asus TUF A16 - 82 vs 65 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 63% cheaper than m18 (2024) - $949.0 vs $2542.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than m18 (2024) - $14.6 vs $31.0 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $2,542 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92896 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
65
79.26829268292683%
Value, $/FPS
$14.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
74.16918429003022%
Multi-Core
9281
67.39525088955051%
m18 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7845HX | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 18" | Screen Size | 16" |
