Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — m18 (2024) outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of m18 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 2000% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Asus TUF A16 - 21 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 85% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Asus TUF A16 - $121.05 vs $809.0 per FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 68% cheaper than m18 (2024) - $809.0 vs $2542.0
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for $2,542 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101416 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
1
4.761904761904762%
Value, $/FPS
$809/FPS
14.962917181705809%
Price, $
$809
100%
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14935 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
74.16918429003022%
Multi-Core
9281
67.39525088955051%
m18 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7845HX | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
4 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
18" | Screen Size | 16" |