Key Differences
In short — m18 (2024) outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of m18 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than ASUS TUF A16 - 37 vs 29 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 39% cheaper than m18 (2024) - $1549.0 vs $2542.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Starfield than m18 (2024) - $53.41 vs $68.7 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $2,542 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101417 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
29
78.37837837837837%
Value, $/FPS
$53.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1549
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14935 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
93.27794561933534%
Multi-Core
11626
84.42378912206811%
m18 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7845HX | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
4 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
18" | Screen Size | 16" |