Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce MX330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1628 days older than GeForce MX330.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 10 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 63% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce MX330 - 44 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX330 - 4 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce MX330
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1531 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1594 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
