Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce MX330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2139 days older than GeForce MX330.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 10 vs 19 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 2 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 111% better in Elden Ring than GeForce MX330 - 78 vs 37 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce MX330
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX330
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
25.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
38.26 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
1531 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
| 1594 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |
