Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce MX330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 2169 days older than GeForce MX330.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 10 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than GeForce MX330 - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX330 - 3 vs 2 GB
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce MX330
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1531 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1594 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
