Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce MX150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 629 days older than GeForce MX150.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 10 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 280% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than GeForce MX150 - 38 vs 10 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 4 vs 2 GB
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GeForce MX150
Mobile • May 17th, 2017
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
May 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 937 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1038 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
