Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce MX150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 1114 days older than GeForce MX150.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 10 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 26% better in The Callisto Protocol than GeForce MX150 - 68 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 4 vs 2 GB
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce MX150
Mobile • May 17th, 2017
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
May 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 937 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 1038 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
