Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce MX150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1170 days older than GeForce MX150.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 10 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 90% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than GeForce MX150 - 19 vs 10 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 3 vs 2 GB
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GeForce MX150
Mobile • May 17th, 2017
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
May 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
937 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1038 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
