Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1693 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 30 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 26% better in F1 22 than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 83 vs 66 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
