Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 2311 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 12% better in New World than Radeon R7 260 - 72 vs 64 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 30 vs 95 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 4 vs 2 GB
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |