Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 2178 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 30 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 4% better in Dota 2 than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 169 vs 162 FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
40%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
