In Atomfall, the Arc A310 is much slower than the Arc A770 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $162 cheaper!
Arc A310
- Up to 58% cheaper – $118.37 vs $279.99
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 150% faster in Atomfall – 85 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 150% faster in Atomfall
- Up to 5% better value in Atomfall – $3.29 vs $3.48/FPS
- Up to 5% better value in Atomfall
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Arc A310 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
34 FPS
40%
Min 1% FPS
25 FPS
39%
Price, $
$118.37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.48/FPS
95%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
42%
Value, $/FPS
$3.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Arc A310 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Arc A310 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
24%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
14%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2022 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Alchemist (Arc 3) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
