In Atomfall, the Arc A310 is much slower than the Arc B580. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $182 cheaper!
Arc A310
- Up to 61% cheaper – $118.37 vs $299.99
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 1% better value in Atomfall – $3.48 vs $3.52/FPS
- Up to 1% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 30 vs 190 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
Arc B580
- Up to 150% faster in Atomfall – 85 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 150% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Dec 13, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2022
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Arc A310 vs Arc B580: Comparison of performance and price
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
34 FPS
40%
Min 1% FPS
25 FPS
39%
Price, $
$118.37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.48/FPS
100%
Arc B580
Dec 13th, 2024
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$299.99
39%
Value, $/FPS
$3.52/FPS
99%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Arc A310 vs Arc B580: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Arc A310 vs Arc B580: Comparison of core performance specifications
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
27%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
13%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
20%
Arc B580
Dec 13th, 2024
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
456 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
213.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
427.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.67 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc B580 Dec 13th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2022 | Released | Dec 13th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Alchemist (Arc 3) | Generation | Battlemage (Arc 5) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 190 W |
