In Atomfall, the Arc A310 is much slower than the Arc B570 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $112 cheaper!
Arc A310
- Up to 49% cheaper – $118.37 vs $230.42
- Up to 49% cheaper
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 30 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 80% less energy
Arc B570
- Up to 121% faster in Atomfall – 75 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 121% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Jan 16, 2025 vs Oct 12, 2022
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 12% better value in Atomfall – $3.07 vs $3.48/FPS
- Up to 12% better value in Atomfall
- Up to 150% more VRAM memory – 10 vs 4 GB
- Up to 150% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Arc A310 vs Arc B570: Comparison of performance and price
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
34 FPS
45%
Min 1% FPS
25 FPS
45%
Price, $
$118.37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.48/FPS
88%
Arc B570
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
75 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
100%
Price, $
$230.42
51%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Arc A310 vs Arc B570: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Arc A310 vs Arc B570: Comparison of core performance specifications
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
40%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
23%
Arc B570
Jan 16th, 2025
Memory
10 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
380 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
200 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
360 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.52 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc B570 Jan 16th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2022 | Released | Jan 16th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $219.00 |
| Alchemist (Arc 3) | Generation | Battlemage (Arc 5) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
