In Rust, the Arc A310 is quite a bit slower than the Arc A770. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $162 cheaper!
Arc A310
- Up to 58% cheaper – $118.37 vs $279.99
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 36% better value in Rust – $1.00 vs $1.57/FPS
- Up to 36% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 51% faster in Rust – 178 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 51% faster in Rust
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Rust FPS Calculator
Arc A310 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
118 FPS
66%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
66%
Price, $
$118.37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
178 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
42%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
64%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Arc A310 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Arc A310 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
24%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
14%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2022 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Alchemist (Arc 3) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
