Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1275 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 10% better in Dirt 5 than Radeon R9 Nano - 125 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 120 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 6 vs 4 GB
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$226.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $226.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
66%
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$649 | MSRP | $279 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |