Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3)

Buy for $154.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8105 minutes ago

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3)

Buy for $154.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8105 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1335 days older than GeForce GTX 1650.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano

  • Performs up to 14% better in Immortals of Aveum than GeForce GTX 1650 - 25 vs 22 FPS

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

  • Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 75 vs 175 Watts
This is a free version of Immortals of Aveum.
Immortals of Aveum

Immortals of Aveum

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo
Radeon R9 Nano

Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015


FPS

25

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

22

88%

Value, $/FPS

$7.05/FPS

100%

Price, $

$154.99

100%

Value Winner

MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3)

Buy for $154.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8105 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo
Radeon R9 Nano

Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo
Radeon R9 Nano

Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015


Pixel Fillrate

64 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

256 GTexel/s

100%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

83%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

36%

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Aug 27th, 2015Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
Pirate IslandsGenerationGeForce 16
$649MSRP
$149
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 8-pinPower ConnectorsNone
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4 GBMemory4 GB
HBMTypeGDDR5
4096-bitBus128-bit
512 GB/s
Bandwidth128.1 GB/s
1000 MHzBase Clock Speed
1485 MHz
Not AvailableBoost Clock Speed1665 MHz
500 MHzMemory Clock Speed
2001 MHz

Builds Using Radeon R9 Nano or GeForce GTX 1650

Immortals of Aveum, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.